2006-11-22

Having Older Brothers Increases a Man's Odds of Being Gay

June 27, 2006
Science Image: family tree
The number of biological older brothers a boy's mother has carried--whether they live with him in the same household or not--affects his chances of being gay. The findings, reported this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, by Anthony Bogaert of Brock University, lend credence to the theory that it's not the social or rearing factors that influence a man's sexual orientation, but rather prenatal mechanisms that begin in the womb.

The idea that prenatal mechanisms may influence sexual orientation has been around for a couple of decades. In 1996, Bogaert along with colleague Ray Blanchard correlated sexual orientation in men with the number of older brothers, but it wasn't clear if that influence was occurring because the boys shared the same household or because they had shared the same womb.


In the new study, Bogaert pitted prenatal against postnatal by examining four samples of homosexual and heterosexual men, for a total of 944 participants. The data for three of the samples had been collected previously, and included detailed information about the men's sexual orientation, as well as their family life. Because most of the men from these three study groups came from unbroken families, Bogaert looked at a fourth group, composed of men who had been adopted or raised with half- or step-siblings. He also gathered data from this group about how long members lived with each sibling and whether they had brothers or sisters with whom they had never lived.
He reasoned that if the social or rearing factor theories were correct, he would expect to see certain things. First, it wouldn't matter whether a gay man's older brothers had been biologically related or not, the social influence would be there. Second, the amount of time the young boy lived with his older brothers, biological or not, should affect his sexual orientation. Third, if the boy did not live with older brothers, then the numbers should not impact his sexual preference.

Bogaert found the opposite to be true. First, he found that only the number of biological older brothers predicted sexual orientation in men--even when the number of non-biological older brothers was significantly higher. Second, his study showed that the amount of time reared with older brothers--either related or not--did not predict a young boy's becoming homosexual. And surprisingly, Bogaert discovered that even if a young man did not grow up in the same house as his older brothers, the fact that he had older biological brothers increased his odds of being gay.

The fact that the common denominator between the older and younger biological brothers is the mother hints at a prenatal influence on sexual orientation. What it could be is still a mystery. But one theory suggests that after delivering a boy, a woman's immune system produces antibodies to male-specific proteins. During subsequent pregnancies the mother's placenta may deliver the antibodies to the fetus, possibly affecting its development. --Tracy Staedter


RELATED LINKS:
By the Numbers: Gay and Lesbian Census
Do Gays Have a Choice?

Flaws in Placenta May Be Early Sign of Autism

Science Image: autism
Image: ASSOCIATED PRESS
The earliest indicator yet of autism may be the presence of flawed cells in the placenta, scientists have discovered. The findings could lead to earlier diagnosis of the developmental disorder that affects approximately one in every 200 children and can result in learning difficulties, speech problems and difficulty relating to people.

"The earlier we diagnose it, the more we'll understand the disease and the better and more potent our interventions may be," says research scientist Harvey Kliman of the Yale School of Medicine. Kliman and his team report their finding in the June 26 online issue of Biological Psychiatry.


The research builds on Kliman's previous work, which described abnormal, microscopic pits in the skin of the placenta. In the past, these abnormalities have been linked with a long list of genetic defects, including Down's syndrome and Turner's syndrome.
Kliman suspected that they may also be linked to autism. So in this study, he and other researchers at Yale used a microscope to examine tissue samples acquired from placenta saved by various research hospitals. Thirteen of the samples came from children later diagnosed with a form of autism; 61 samples came from children who were not diagnosed with the disease. When Kliman compared the two different kinds of tissue, he found that the placentas from the autistic children were three times more likely to have the abnormal microscopic pits.

Kliman thinks that the research could lead to routine analyses of placenta from at-risk newborns, particularly those with an older brother or sister with autism. Not every autistic child may be linked to the abnormal features on the placenta. But, says Kliman, "If you do see this feature, it's unlikely that the child is completely normal." --Tracy Staedter


RELATED LINKS:
Blood Markers May Portend Autism and Mental Retardation
The Early Origins of Autism

Study Bolsters Link between Pesticides and Parkinson's

June 26, 2006

Science Image: pesticides
Image: ASSOCIATED PRESS
People who have been exposed to pesticides are 70 percent more likely to develop Parkinson's disease than those who haven't, according to a new study. The results suggest that any pesticide exposure, whether occupationally related or not, will increase a person's risk of the disease. This means that using pesticides in the home or garden may have similarly harmful effects as working with the chemicals on a farm or as a pest controller.

The research, published in the July issue of Annals of Neurology, provides the strongest evidence to date of the link between pesticide exposure and Parkinson's. The study included over 143,000 men and women who completed extensive lifestyle questionnaires beginning in 1982, and follow-up surveys through 2001. All subjects were symptom-free at the beginning of the project, when they were asked about their occupation and exposure to potentially hazardous materials. Since then, 413 of them have developed confirmed cases of Parkinson's, with a greater incidence of the disease in those who spent time around pesticides. "Low- dose pesticide exposure was associated with a significant increase in risk for Parkinson's disease," says lead author Alberto Ascherio of the Harvard School for Public Health. "I think this is one reason to be careful about using pesticides in general."


Although the causes of Parkinson's are not well understood, it has long been suspected that environmental factors play a large role. Animal studies have shown that chemical compounds commonly used as pesticides can cause a degeneration of dopamine-producing neurons. In Parkinson's, a shortage of dopamine causes the disease's characteristic motor abnormalities, including muscle tremors and muscle rigidity. Previous small-scale human studies had suggested a link between pesticides and Parkinson's, but this new study is the first to establish a clear correlation in a large patient population.

The researchers also looked for links between Parkinson's and other environmental contaminants, including asbestos, coal dust, exhaust, formaldehyde and radioactive material. They found no correlation between the disease and any of the materials besides pesticides, however. Because of the design of the questionnaires, the study was not able to determine how the frequency, duration, or intensity of pesticide exposure affected the incidence of Parkinson's. The next step, according to Ascherio, is to figure out which class of chemicals is actually causing the disease, so that people can reduce their exposure. --Karen Schrock


RELATED LINKS:
New Movement in Parkinson's
Pesticides and Parkinson's
Coffee's Ties to Parkinson's

Genetics Tool Inspires New Method for Dating Old Art

June 21, 2006

Science Image: old print
Image: COURTESY OF BLAIR HEDGES, PENN STATE
A molecular biologist has borrowed a technique from genetic science to date hand-printed art. The so-called print clock method, developed by Blair Hedges of Pennsylvania State University, could help historians and collectors pinpoint when thousands of undated, hand-printed materials were created.

Hedges, who does field work in the Carribbean and happens to collect old maps of the area, conceived of the method after noticing that later editions of the same maps had more line breaks. The flaws exist because printmakers often used the same wood blocks and metal plates for decades and those components deteriorated over time.


He started thinking that the flaws were analogous to the mutations that occur in genetic material. Such mutations do not happen at evenly spaced intervals, but if you can find a lot of them, you can come up with an average rate at which the mutations occur over time. It's called a molecular clock technique. "I'm used to using molecular clocks and counting mutations in genes," Hedges says. "I thought maybe the same principle might apply to this case with prints."

To test his hypothesis, Hedges compiled a database of 2,674 maps from the Renaissance. In some cases, he knew the dates of the pieces; in others, he didn't. Using image analysis software called ImageJ, which is freely available from the National Institutes of Health, Hedges was able to detect and count line breaks and measure faded edges. In prints with known dates, Hedges saw that the number of flaws increased over time.

Knowing this, he was able to develop a simple method for finding the date of mystery print. For example, he said, let's say you have a print with 10 line breaks dated at 1550. Another print from the same printmaker has 20 line breaks and is dated to 1560. The average line break will average to 1 line break per year. If a third, undated print from the same printmaker has 30 line breaks, you can calculate the date to 1570.

Hedges has already used his method to establish a date for a much debated edition of Bordone's Isolario,an atlas containing maps of islands. He also hopes to use the genetics-inspired system on two of Shakespeare's plays as well as several Rembrandt prints. --Tracy Staedter

Ancient Shell Beads Could Be First Sign of Modern Culture

June 23, 2006

Science Image: ancient shell beads
Image: COURTESY OF MARIAN VANHAEREN AND FRANCESCO D'ERRICO
According to fashionistas, you are what your wear. But when did humans start decorating themselves for self-expression? Three bead-like shells from ancient Israel and Algeria suggest that such symbolic behavior occurred at least 100,000 years ago--25,000 years earlier than previously thought.

The findings, reported today in Science by Marian Vanhaeren of the University College London and colleagues, challenge the notion that modern humans developed cultural symbols--a precursor to language--only after they arrived in Europe. "Our paper supports the scenario that modern humans in Africa developed behaviors that are considered modern quite early in time, so that in fact these people were probably not just biologically modern but also culturally and cognitively modern, at least to some degree," says team member Francesco d'Errico of CNRS in Talence, France.


Jewelry, along with other artifacts including cave paintings and musical instruments, indicate that their creators were thinking symbolically, the essence of modern culture. Because symbolic artifacts become plentiful in the archaeological record about 40,000 years ago in Europe, researchers have generally believed that cultural modernity emerged in Europe with modern humans. But two years ago, Vanhaeren and d'Errico found 75,000-year-old snail shell beads from a site in South Africa, raising questions about when bling became big.
The scientists began rooting through museum collections to see if they could find more evidence of early beadworking. Indeed, they found three shells with what appear to be puncture holes very similar to those in the shells found in South Africa. Two of the snail shells, discovered at the Natural History Museum in London, came from a 1930 excavation of a burial site in Israel known as Es-Skhul (see image). The third shell, found at the Musee de l'Homme in Paris, came from the 1940s excavation of a site called Oued Djebbana in Algeria.

To be sure of the antiquity of the beads, the scientists analyzed sediments stuck to the shells and compared them with known dates from the sites. They determined that the Skhul shells came from the same layer of soil where archaeologists found human remains dating to between 100,000 and 135,000 years ago. A single available radio carbon date from Oued Djebbana indicates that the bead is at least 35,000 years old, but other evidence from the site, such as stone tools, suggests that it could be up to 90,000 years old.

A handful of beads may not yet overturn established dogma. But the fact that these snail shells were located far inland from their Mediterranean marine habitat indicates they were transported, perhaps by someone desiring to express their personal style. --Tracy Staedter

Reflooding Restores Wildlife to Iraqi Marshes

May 30, 2006

Science Image: Iraqi marshes
Image: © Canada-Iraq Marshlands Initiative 2005
In the 1990s the Garden of Eden was destroyed. The fertile wetlands between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers were diked and drained, turning most of 15,000 square kilometers of marsh to desert. By the year 2000, less than 10 percent of that swampland--nearly twice as big as Florida's Everglades--remained. But reflooding of some areas since 2003 has produced what some scientists are calling the "miracle of the Mesopotamian marshes"--a return of plants, aquatic life and even rare birds to their ancestral home.

Curtis Richardson of Duke University and Najah Hussain of the University of Basra in Iraq have conducted the first ecological survey of the restored marshes. By September of last year, 39 percent of the original marshland was again underwater according to satellite photos. The natural rivers of grass had returned to these fragmented marshes and the scientists chose four to monitor: Al-Hawizeh (the only remaining natural marsh), Al-Hammar, Abu Zarag and Suq Al-Shuyukh. They found that by a host of measures, ranging from water quality to wildlife the marshes were returning to health.


Helped by increased snowmelt from the mountains of bordering Turkey and Iran, the reflooded marshes avoided high levels of toxins, heavy metals and other releases from the dry soil. As a result, vegetation is expanding to cover an additional 800 square kilometers per year. With vegetation, fish, crustaceans and other water creatures have returned, though not to historic levels. And bird species not seen in decades--such as the highly threatened Iraq babbler--have reappeared, part of a total of 74 returned birds.
This miracle's long-term viability is threatened, however, by increasing competition for the water itself. "In drought years, that is when the real crunch will come," Richardson notes. "They key is the water has to flow, it continually has to flush the system." With dammed irrigation projects in Turkey, Syria and Iran as well as increasing demands from Iraqi farmers, the marshes that cradled human civilization may get short shrift. "When Mother Nature was running it, the marshes used to get it all," Richardson adds. "My hope is that agriculture will work with the restoration effort and recycle some of that water." The ecosystem report appears in the current issue of BioScience. --David Biello

Ozone and Cholesterol Combine to Cause Heart Disease

May 31, 2006

Science Image: smog, ozone, los angeles
Numerous studies have linked heart disease and air pollution, particularly smog. Smog--a toxic brew of chemicals and molecules such as ozone--seems to exacerbate heart disease, leading to an increase in heart attacks and fatalities. But researchers have yet to discover the pathway by which smog impacts the cardiovascular system. Now a new study shows how ozone's byproducts in the body can harden arteries and cause heart disease.

Chemist Paul Wentworth, Jr., of the Scripps Research Institute and his colleagues tested such byproducts--known as atheronals--in vitro. These molecules form when ozone and cholesterol interact. "Cholesterol makes up 40 percent of most of your membranes, including those in your lungs," Wentworth explains. "If you inspire smog, there directly is the interaction."


The team's previous research had shown that the white blood cells responsible for inflaming arterial walls also produce ozone and, ultimately, the atheronals: atheronal-a and atheronal-b. These compounds are present in the plaque removed from clogged arteries. The new research shows that when the atheronals interact with various blood cells, they produce some of the effects known to lead to heart disease, such as causing a malfunction in the cells that line arterial walls. "The atheronals can actually cause all the relative aspects that are known to promote cardiovascular disease," Wentworth notes.
It remains unclear whether the atheronals typically derive from interactions in the bloodstream or in the lungs. "My sense is that it's a combination of both," Wentworth says. And more research will be needed to determine whether atheronal levels in the blood speed the onset of heart disease such as atherosclerosis. Nevertheless, the scientists write: "the atheronals may be a heretofore unrecognized chemical player in the known linkage between environmental pollution and cardiovascular disease." The research will appear in the June 13 issue of Biochemistry. --David Biello

Large Study Finds No Link between Marijuana and Lung Cancer

May 24, 2006

Science Image: marijuana, cannabis
The smoke from burning marijuana leaves contains several known carcinogens and the tar it creates contains 50 percent more of some of the chemicals linked to lung cancer than tobacco smoke. A marijuana cigarette also deposits four times as much of that tar as an equivalent tobacco one. Scientists were therefore surprised to learn that a study of more than 2,000 people found no increase in the risk of developing lung cancer for marijuana smokers.

"We expected that we would find that a history of heavy marijuana use--more than 500 to 1,000 uses--would increase the risk of cancer from several years to decades after exposure to marijuana," explains physician Donald Tashkin of the University of California, Los Angeles, and lead researcher on the project. But looking at residents of Los Angeles County, the scientists found that even those who smoked more than 20,000 joints in their life did not have an increased risk of lung cancer.


The researchers interviewed 611 lung cancer patients and 1,040 healthy controls as well as 601 patients with cancer in the head or neck region under the age of 60 to create the statistical analysis. They found that 80 percent of those with lung cancer and 70 percent of those with other cancers had smoked tobacco while only roughly half of both groups had smoked marijuana. The more tobacco a person smoked, the greater the risk of developing cancer, as other studies have shown.
But after controlling for tobacco, alcohol and other drug use as well as matching patients and controls by age, gender and neighborhood, marijuana did not seem to have an effect, despite its unhealthy aspects. "Marijuana is packed more loosely than tobacco, so there's less filtration through the rod of the cigarette, so more particles will be inhaled," Tashkin says. "And marijuana smokers typically smoke differently than tobacco smokers; they hold their breath about four times longer allowing more time for extra fine particles to deposit in the lungs."

The study does not reveal how marijuana avoids causing cancer. Tashkin speculates that perhaps the THC chemical in marijuana smoke prompts aging cells to die before becoming cancerous. Tashkin and his colleagues presented the findings yesterday at a meeting of the American Thoracic Society in San Diego. --David Biello

Scientists Identify Brain Region Responsible for Calculating Risk versus Reward

June 15, 2006

Science Image: human brain
As any gambler knows, the most important decision is where to play. Some flit from table to table, machine to machine and game to game. Others prefer to settle in for the long haul. Now researchers have used those tendencies to probe the function of the human brain as it chooses between the familiar and the unknown.

Nathaniel Daw and John O'Doherty of University College London and their colleagues employed slot machines and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate how 14 healthy subjects decided between reaping steady profits at a given slot machine or testing the profit potential of a new one. Scientists call the behavior of utilizing a known resource exploitation; the term they give to the behavior of seeking an even better resource is exploration. Although exploitation seems the safe bet, survival can depend on judicious use of exploration.


"The desire to select what seems the richest option is always balanced against the desire to choose a less familiar option that might turn out to serve better," Daw explains. "Most people switch between exploring and exploiting seamlessly and this has always made it hard to distinguish between someone who is doing something they know will offer the highest payout and a person who is testing out new options."

To so distinguish, the neuroscientists set up four slot machines to pay off at four different average rates. After each trial, these payoffs changed randomly from machine to machine. In order to discover which slot machine paid the most, a given subject would have to select it at the risk of abandoning a higher paying machine. After the tests were completed, the subjects reported that they had occasionally tried different machines to find the highest reward and sometimes stuck with a slot that they thought offered the most.

The researchers were thus able to categorize whether the subjects were exploring or exploiting in any given trial. They found that human exploration follows the so-called softmax mathematical rule, in which subjects choose whether to explore or not based on the probability of a better payout. In other words, if you determine your reward at a given machine will be small, you are more likely to change.

That much the slot machines and interviews revealed. The fMRI showed that the frontopolar cortex and sulcus of a given subject strongly activated when they chose to explore. Other studies have implicated these regions in behavioral control and decision making, according to the paper presenting the finding in today's Nature, but this is the first time neuroscientists have marked these areas of the brain as associated with investigating the unknown. Exploration turns out to be a controlled gamble after all. --David Biello

New Nanomaterial Fuses Spider Silk and Silica

June 14, 2006

Science Image: spider web
Researchers have created a novel nanomaterial that combines the strength of spider silk with the rigidity of silica. The product could help pave the way for the fabrication of replacement bones.

Regrowing bone requires a scaffold that is stiff, long-lasting and safe. With that in mind, David Kaplan of Tufts University and his colleagues decided to marry the protein that constitutes the drag lines of golden silk orb weaver spiders with the protein that helps diatoms--a subset of plankton--make silica, a glasslike compound. The spider-silk protein alone "just doesn't have the stiffness you want, that's why you need the glass," Kaplan says.


After splicing the two proteins together, the team then processed the resulting chimeric protein into both films and fibers and tested the result. As hoped, the films and fibers created dense silica coatings for themselves. By using electric current or varying conditions, the researchers could also control the size and shape of the resulting materials. "We were able to control and bring it down to two microns [wide]," adds team member Cheryl Wong Po Foo of Tufts. "We're going into the nanoscale range."
Initial tests of the nanomaterial's medical potential is being conducted in vitro, but the researchers hope to try it out in animals in the near future, using it to help guide the growth of a hip replacement, for example. The possibilities do not end there, however. The chimeric protein forms this material at low temperatures and without chemicals other than water. Current industrial practices for making silica require high heat and ionic extremes. "You can think of high performance materials made via an aqueous, room temperature, green chemistry," Kaplan notes. The research is being published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. --David Biello

Renewed Hopes for Vaccine to Treat Alzheimer's

June 13, 2006

In 2003 preliminary clinical trials of a vaccine to treat Alzheimer's disease were halted because 18 of the 298 patients developed swelling in their brains. The doctors had hoped that by exposing the human immune system to small amounts of beta-amyloid--a protein thought to initiate the buildup of plaques in the brain that underlies the neurodegenerative disease--it could be trained to expel the rogue protein. Instead, in 6 percent of the patients, the immune system overreacted and damaged the brain itself. Now scientists have developed a new DNA-based vaccine that causes cells to produce extra beta-amyloid, thereby engaging the immune system to attack the protein. Plus, when administered to mice, it had no adverse effects.

Yoh Matsumoto of the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute for Neuroscience and his colleagues developed the vaccine by tinkering with the DNA that governs beta-amyloid production. The researchers then tested the vaccine under two conditions: as a preventative against development of plaques and as a therapy once plaques had developed. This meant vaccinating specially bred mice from the age of three months--before they had developed plaques--and after 12 months--once plaque cluttering had begun.


After just four months of biweekly injections, mice in the preventative group had as much as 30 percent less beta-amyloid buildup than untreated controls had; after a year, up to 50 percent less. "The final reduction rate of beta amyloid burden in the cerebral cortex at 18 months of age was roughly 38.5 percent of untreated groups," the team writes in their report, published online this week by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The DNA vaccine was also effective as a therapy. After just six months of treatment, it cut beta-amyloid levels by as much as 40 percent. Most importantly, no matter how often the vaccine was administered, no brain swelling was observed. "Nonviral beta-amyloid DNA vaccines are highly effective and safe in reducing the beta-amyloid burden in model mice and, thus, are promising as a vaccine therapy against human Alzheimer's disease," the researchers conclude. --David Biello

Shutting Down Alzheimer's

New research reveals strategies for blocking the molecular processes that lead to this memory-destroying disease
By Michael S. Wolfe
The human brain is a remarkably complex organic computer, taking in a wide variety of sensory experiences, processing and storing this information, and recalling and integrating selected bits at the right moments. The destruction caused by Alzheimer's disease has been likened to the erasure of a hard drive, beginning with the most recent files and working backward. An initial sign of the disease is often the failure to recall events of the past few days--a phone conversation with a friend, a repairman's visit to the house--while recollections from long ago remain intact. As the illness progresses, however, the old as well as the new memories gradually disappear until even loved ones are no longer recognized. The fear of Alzheimer's stems not so much from anticipated physical pain and suffering but rather from the inexorable loss of a lifetime of memories that make up a person's very identity.

Unfortunately, the computer analogy breaks down: one cannot simply reboot the human brain and reload the files and programs. The problem is that Alzheimer's does not only erase information; it destroys the very hardware of the brain, which is composed of more than 100 billion nerve cells (neurons), with 100 trillion connections among them. Most current medications for Alzheimer's take advantage of the fact that many of the neurons lost to the disease release a type of chemical communicator (or neurotransmitter) called acetylcholine. Because these medicines block an enzyme responsible for the normal decomposition of acetylcholine, they increase the levels of this otherwise depleted neurotransmitter. The result is stimulation of neurons and clearer thinking, but these drugs typically become ineffective within six months to a year because they cannot stop the relentless devastation of neurons. Another medication, called memantine, appears to slow the cognitive decline in patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer's by blocking excessive activity of a different neurotransmitter (glutamate), but investigators have not yet determined whether the drug's effects last more than a year.


More than a decade ago few people were optimistic about the prospects for defeating Alzheimer's. Scientists knew so little about the biology of the disease, and its origins and course were thought to be hopelessly complex. Recently, however, researchers have made tremendous progress toward understanding the molecular events that appear to trigger the illness, and they are now exploring a variety of strategies for slowing or halting these destructive processes. Perhaps one of these treatments, or a combination of them, could impede the degeneration of neurons enough to stop Alzheimer's disease in its tracks. Several candidate therapies are undergoing clinical trials and have yielded some promising preliminary results. More and more researchers are feeling hope--a word not usually associated with Alzheimer's.

The Amyloid Hypothesis
The two key features of the disease, first noted by German neurologist Alois Alzheimer 100 years ago, are plaques and tangles of proteins in the cerebral cortex and limbic system, which are responsible for higher brain functions. The plaques are deposits found outside the neurons and are composed primarily of a small protein called amyloid-beta, or A-beta. The tangles are located inside neurons and their branching projections (axons and dendrites) and are made of filaments of a protein called tau. The observation of these anomalies started a debate that lasted throughout most of the 20th century: Are the plaques and tangles responsible for the degeneration of brain neurons, or are they merely markers of where neuronal death has already occurred? In the past decade, the weight of evidence has shifted toward the amyloid-cascade hypothesis, which posits that both A-beta and tau are intimately involved in causing Alzheimer's disease, with A-beta providing the initial insult.

A-beta is a short peptide, or protein fragment, first isolated and characterized in 1984 by George G. Glenner and Cai'ne W. Wong, then at the University of California, San Diego. This peptide is derived from a larger protein called the amyloid-beta precursor protein, or APP. Molecules of APP stick through the cellular membrane, with one part of the protein inside the cell and another part outside. Two protein-cutting enzymes, or proteases--beta-secretase and gamma-secretase--carve out A-beta from APP, a process that occurs normally in virtually all cells in the body. The reason why cells make A-beta is unclear, but current evidence suggests that the process is part of a signaling pathway.


Alzheimer's disease destroys the very hardware of the brain.


A portion of the A-beta region of APP is inside the membrane itself, between its outer and inner layers. Because membranes are composed of water-repelling lipids, the regions of proteins that pass through membranes typically contain water-repelling amino acids. When A-beta is cut out of APP by beta- and gamma-secretase and released into the aqueous environment outside the membrane, the water-repelling regions of different A-beta molecules cling to one another, forming small soluble assemblies. In the early 1990s Peter T. Lansbury, Jr., now at Harvard Medical School, showed that at high enough concentrations, A-beta molecules in a test tube can assemble into fiberlike structures similar to those found in the plaques of Alzheimer's disease. The soluble assemblies as well as the fibers of A-beta are toxic to neurons cultured in petri dishes, and the former can interfere with processes critical to learning and memory in mice.

These findings supported the amyloid-cascade hypothesis, but the strongest evidence came from studies of families at especially high risk of getting Alzheimer's. Members of these families carry rare genetic mutations that predestine them for the disease at a relatively young age, typically before 60. In 1991 John A. Hardy, now at the National Institute on Aging, and his colleagues discovered the first such mutations in the gene that encodes APP, specifically affecting the areas of the protein in and around the A-beta region. Soon afterward, Dennis J. Selkoe of Harvard and Steven Younkin of the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Fla., independently found that these mutations increase the formation of either A-beta in general or a particular type of A-beta that is highly prone to forming deposits. Moreover, people with Down syndrome, who carry three copies of chromosome 21 instead of the normal two copies, have a much higher incidence of Alzheimer's in middle age. Because chromosome 21 contains the APP gene, people with Down syndrome produce higher levels of A-beta from birth, and amyloid deposits can be found in their brains as early as age 12.

Researchers soon discovered other connections between Alzheimer's disease and the genes that regulate the production of A-beta. In 1995 Peter St. George-Hyslop and his colleagues at the University of Toronto identified mutations in two related genes dubbed presenilin 1 and 2 that cause very early and aggressive forms of Alzheimer's, typically appearing when the carrier is in his or her 30s or 40s. Further studies showed that these mutations increase the proportion of A-beta that is prone to clumping. We now know that the proteins encoded by the presenilin genes are part of the gamma-secretase enzyme.


Thus, of the three genes known to cause Alzheimer's early in life, one encodes the precursor to A-beta and the other two specify components of a protease enzyme that helps to manufacture the harmful peptide. Furthermore, scientists have found that people carrying a certain variation in the gene encoding apolipoprotein E--a protein that helps to bring together the A-beta peptides in assemblies and filaments--have a substantially elevated risk of developing Alzheimer's later in life. A variety of genetic factors most likely play a role in the onset of the disease, with each contributing in a small way, and mouse studies indicate that environmental factors may also affect the disease risk (exercise, for example, may lower it).
Scientists still do not understand exactly how the soluble assemblies and insoluble filaments of A-beta disrupt and kill neurons. The evidence suggests, though, that aggregates of A-beta outside a neuron can initiate a cascade of events that include the alteration of the tau proteins inside the cell. In particular, the A-beta aggregates can ultimately change the cellular activity of enzymes called kinases that install phosphates onto proteins. The affected kinases add too many phosphates to tau, changing the proteins' chemical properties and causing them to form twisted filaments. The altered tau proteins somehow kill the neuron, perhaps because they disrupt the microtubules that transport proteins and other large molecules along axons and dendrites. Mutations in the tau gene itself can also generate tau filaments and cause other types of neurodegenerative diseases besides Alzheimer's. Thus, the formation of tau filaments is apparently a more general event leading to neuronal death, whereas A-beta is the specific initiator in Alzheimer's disease.

Clamping the Molecular Scissors
Given the critical role of A-beta in the disease process, the proteases that produce this peptide are obvious targets for potential drugs that could inhibit their activity. Protease inhibitors have proved very effective for treating other disorders such as AIDS and hypertension. The first step in the formation of A-beta is initiated by beta-secretase, a protease that clips off the bulk of APP just outside the cellular membrane. In 1999 five different research groups independently discovered this enzyme, which is particularly abundant in brain neurons. Although beta-secretase is tethered to the membrane, it closely resembles a subset of proteases found in the aqueous environments inside and outside cells. Members of this subset--which includes the protease involved in replicating HIV, the virus that causes AIDS--use aspartic acid, a type of amino acid, to catalyze the protein-cutting reaction. All proteases use water to cut their respective proteins, and enzymes in the aspartyl protease family employ a pair of aspartic acids to activate a water molecule for this purpose.

Because beta-secretase clearly falls into this family, researchers were able to exploit the vast knowledge about these proteases, leading to a very detailed understanding of this enzyme and how it might be shut down. Indeed, investigators already know the three-dimensional structure of beta-secretase and have used it as a guide for computer-based drug design of potential inhibitors. Genetic studies suggest that blocking the enzyme's activity will not lead to harmful side effects; deletion of the gene encoding beta-secretase in mice eliminated A-beta formation in the rodents' brains without causing any apparent negative consequences. For the moment, however, beta-secretase inhibitors are not yet ready for clinical trials. The main challenge is to develop potent compounds that are small enough to effectively penetrate the brain. Unlike blood vessels in other parts of the human body, capillaries in the brain are lined with endothelial cells that are very tightly packed. Because there are few gaps between the cells, the protease inhibitors must be able to pass through the cell membranes to reach the brain tissues beyond, and most large molecules cannot breach this so-called blood-brain barrier.


A variety of genetic factors most likely play a role in the onset of the disease.

The enzyme called gamma-secretase performs the second step in the formation of A-beta, cutting the stump of APP remaining after the cleavage by beta-secretase. Gamma-secretase accomplishes the unusual feat of using water to cut the protein inside the otherwise water-hating environment of the cellular membrane. Two important clues proved essential to our understanding of this protease. First, Bart De Strooper of the Cath�o�lic University of Louvain in Belgium found in 1998 that genetically deleting the presenilin 1 gene in mice greatly reduced the cutting of APP by gamma-secretase, demonstrating that the protein encoded by the gene is essential to the enzyme's function. Second, my laboratory, then at the University of Tennessee at Memphis, discovered that compounds in the same chemical category as the classical inhibitors of aspartyl proteases could block gamma-secretase cleavage of APP in cells. This result suggested that gamma-secretase, like beta-secretase, contains a pair of aspartic acids essential for catalyzing the protein-cutting reaction.
Based on these observations, we hypothesized that the presenilin protein might be an unusual aspartyl protease stitched into the fabric of cell membranes. While I was on sabbatical at Harvard in Selkoe's lab and in collaboration with Weiming Xia, we identified two aspartic acids in presenilin predicted to lie within the membrane and demonstrated that they are both critical to the gamma-secretase cleavage that produces A-beta. Subsequently, we and others showed that the inhibitors of gamma-secretase bind directly to presenilin and that three other membrane-embedded proteins must assemble with presenilin to allow it to catalyze. Today gamma-secretase is recognized as a founding member of a new class of proteases that apparently wield water within cellular membranes to accomplish their biochemical tasks. Better yet, the inhibitors of gamma-secretase are relatively small molecules that can pass through membranes, enabling them to penetrate the blood-brain barrier.

Two years ago I spoke to my youngest son's fifth-grade class about the work in my lab, explaining about amyloid and how we hoped to block the responsible enzymes to discover new medicines for Alzheimer's. One boy interrupted: "But what if that enzyme is doing something important? You could hurt somebody!" This concern, recognized by a 10-year-old, is very real: the potential of gamma-secretase as a therapeutic target is tempered by the fact that this enzyme plays a critical role in the maturation of undifferentiated precursor cells in various parts of the body, such as the stem cells in bone marrow that develop into red blood cells and lymphocytes. Specifically, gamma-secretase cuts a cell-surface protein called the Notch receptor; the piece of Notch released from the membrane inside the cell then sends a signal to the nucleus that controls the cell's fate.

High doses of gamma-secretase inhibitors cause severe toxic effects in mice as a consequence of disrupting the Notch signal, raising serious concerns about this potential therapy. Nevertheless, a drug candidate developed by pharmaceutical maker Eli Lilly has passed safety tests in volunteers. (This kind of test is called a phase I clinical trial.) The compound is now poised to enter the next level of testing (phase II) in patients with early Alzheimer's. Moreover, researchers have identified molecules that modulate gamma-secretase so that A-beta production is blocked without affecting the cleavage of Notch. These molecules do not interact with gamma-secretase's aspartic acids; instead they bind elsewhere on the enzyme and alter its shape.

Some inhibitors can even specifically curtail the creation of the more aggregation-prone version of A-beta in favor of a shorter peptide that does not clump as easily. One such drug, Flurizan, identified by a research team headed by Edward Koo of the University of California, San Diego, and Todd Golde of the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, has shown considerable promise in early-stage Alz�hei�mer's patients and is already entering more advanced (phase III) clinical trials that will include more than 1,000 such subjects across the country.


Clearing the Cobwebs

Another strategy for combating Alzheimer's is to clear the brain of toxic assemblies of A-beta after the peptide is produced. One approach is active immunization, which involves recruiting the patient's own immune system to attack A-beta. In 1999 Dale B. Schenk and his colleagues at Elan Corporation in South San Francisco made a groundbreaking discovery: injecting A-beta into mice genetically engineered to develop amyloid plaques stimulated an immune response that prevented the plaques from forming in the brains of young mice and cleared plaques already present in older mice. The mice produced antibodies that recognized A-beta, and these antibodies apparently prompted the brain's immune cells--the microglia--to attack aggregates of the peptide. The positive results in mice, which included improvements in learning and memory, quickly led to human trials.

Unfortunately, although the injection of A-beta passed initial safety trials, several patients in the phase II tests developed encephalitis--inflammation of the brain--forcing a premature halt to the study in 2002. Follow-up research indicated that the therapy might have caused the inflammation by prompting the T cells of the immune system to make over-aggressive attacks on the A-beta deposits. Nevertheless, the investigation confirmed that many patients produced antibodies against A-beta and that those who did showed subtle signs of improved memory and concentration.

The safety concerns about active immunization led some researchers to try passive immunization, which aims to clear the peptide by injecting antibodies into patients. These antibodies, produced in mouse cells and genetically engineered to prevent rejection in humans, would not be likely to cause encephalitis, because they should not trigger a harmful T cell response in the brain. A passive immunization treatment developed by Elan Corporation has already advanced to phase II clinical trials.

How active or passive immunization can remove A-beta from the brain is somewhat mysterious, because it is unclear how effectively the antibodies can cross the blood-brain barrier. Some evidence suggests that entry into the brain may not be required: sopping up A-beta in the rest of the body may lead to an exodus of the peptide from the brain, because molecules tend to move from high concentrations to lower ones. Although passive immunization now seems to hold the most promise, active immunization is not out of the running. Preliminary studies headed by my Harvard colleague Cynthia Lemere show that immunization with selected parts of A-beta, instead of the entire peptide, can stimulate the antibody-producing B cells of the immune system without triggering the T cells responsible for the encephalitis.


Researchers are feeling hope--a word not usually associated with Alzheimer's.


Other researchers are pursuing nonimmunological strategies to stop the aggregation of A-beta. Several companies have identified compounds that interact directly with A-beta to keep the peptide dissolved in the fluid outside brain neurons, preventing the formation of harmful clumps. Neurochem in Quebec is developing Alzhemed, a small molecule that apparently mimics heparin, the natural anticoagulant. In blood, heparin prevents platelets from gathering into clots, but when this polysaccharide binds to A-beta, it makes the peptide more likely to form deposits. Because Alzhemed binds to the same sites on A-beta, it blocks the heparin activity and hence reduces peptide aggregation. The compound has shown little or no toxicity even at very high doses, and the treatment has resulted in some cognitive improvement in patients with mild Alzheimer's. Phase III clinical trials for this drug candidate are already well under way.

Targeting Tau
Amyloid, however, is just one half of the Alzheimer's equation. The other half, the tau filaments that cause neuronal tangles, is also considered a promising target for preventing the degeneration of brain neurons. In particular, researchers are focused on designing inhibitors that could block the kinases that place an excessive amount of phosphates onto tau, which is an essential step in filament formation. These efforts have not yet resulted in candidate drugs for clinical trials, but the hope is that such agents might ultimately work synergistically with those targeting A-beta.

Investigators are also exploring whether the cholesterol-lowering drugs called statins, which are widely used to cut the risk of heart disease, could become a treatment for Alzheimer's as well. Epidemiological studies suggest that people taking statins have a lower risk of acquiring Alzheimer's. The reason for this correlation is not entirely clear; by lowering cholesterol levels, these drugs may reduce the production of APP, or perhaps they directly affect the creation of A-beta by inhibiting the activity of the responsible secretases. Phase III trials are trying to establish whether statins such as Pfizer's Lipitor can truly prevent Alzheimer's.


Another exciting recent development involves cell therapy. Mark Tuszynski and his colleagues at U.C.S.D. took skin biopsies from patients with mild Alz�heimer's and inserted the gene encoding nerve growth factor (NGF) into these cells. The genetically modified cells were then surgically placed into the forebrains of these patients. The idea was that the implanted cells would produce and secrete NGF, preventing the loss of acetylcholine-producing neurons and improving memory. The cell-based therapy was a clever strategy for delivering NGF, a large protein that could not otherwise penetrate the brain. Although this study included only a handful of subjects and lacked important controls, follow-up research showed a slowing of cognitive decline in the patients. The results were good enough to warrant further clinical trials.
Although some of these potential therapies may not fulfill their promise, scientists hope to find at least one agent that can effectively slow or stop the gradual loss of neurons in the brain. Such a breakthrough could save millions of people from the inexorable decline of Alzheimer's disease and set the stage for regenerative medicine to restore lost mental functions.

Targeting A-beta may block the onset of Alzheimer's or retard it early in its course, but whether this strategy will treat or cure those with more advanced stages of the disease remains unclear. Still, researchers have good reason for cautious optimism. The recent spate of discoveries has convinced many of us that our quest for ways to prevent and treat Alzheimer's will not be in vain.


MICHAEL S. WOLFE is associate professor of neurology at Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, where his work has focused on understanding the molecular basis of Alzheimer's disease and identifying effective therapeutic strategies. He received his Ph.D. in medicinal chemistry from the University of Kansas. This past January he founded the Laboratory for Experimental Alzheimer Drugs at Harvard Medical School, which is dedicated to developing promising molecules into drugs for Alzheimer's disease.

MORE TO EXPLORE:
Decoding Darkness. Rudolph E. Tanzi and Ann B. Parson. Perseus Books Group, 2000.
Hard to Forget: An Alzheimer's Story. Charles Pierce. Random House, 2000.
Therapeutic Strategies for Alzheimer's Disease. Michael S. Wolfe in Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, Vol. 1, pages 859-866; November 2002.
More information can be found online at www.alz.org and www.alzforum.org



Cancer Resistance Found to Be Transferable in Mice

May 09, 2006

Science Image: cancer resistant mouse
Image: COURTESY OF WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY
In 1999 scientists discovered a mutant mouse with the ability to ward off aggressive cancers. Bred with a female, this mighty mouse passed on his cancer resistance to roughly 40 percent of his offspring. No matter how many times the researchers challenged the immune systems of these mice with levels of cancer cells millions of times stronger than those lethal to regular mice, they proved incapable of developing cancer. Now investigators have found that normal mice injected with white blood cells from cancer-resistant mice become resistant themselves.

"The white blood cells alone were the cause of the cancer resistance," says Mark Willingham of Wake Forest University. "Not only could they kill cancer when injected together [with malignant cells], but these white blood cells could successfully be used to treat advanced tumors."


Willingham, fellow pathologist Zheng Cui of Wake Forest and a team of colleagues subjected the various types of white blood cells of the cancer-resistant mice to a battery of tests in an attempt to determine the precise mechanism at work. Contrary to their initial expectations, the cells involved appear to be the basic cleaners of the immune system--macrophages, natural killer cells and neutrophils--rather than the T cells, which must first be exposed to a pathogen in order to know to attack it. "These are the cells normally known to fight bacteria," Cui explains. "If these cells are involved, that's a very obvious indication that these systems are an innate immune response; if you have it, you should have it from the beginning."
But the researchers were able to kill cancer both in vitro and in mice by injecting purified solutions of these white blood cells. Neither did it matter which specific type of innate white blood cell was injected nor where--normal mice with tumors on their backs experienced remission after injections in their bellies.

In fact, a single injection of these cancer-fighting white blood cells conferred long-lasting immunity in the normal mice. "Mice with complete regression remained healthy and tumor-free at the time of publication, 10 months after the experiment," the researchers write in the paper presenting the findings in this week's Proceedings of the National Academies of Science.

Continued research is needed to find the genetic root of this resistance, which has eluded discovery because it seems to be located in different chromosomes depending on the mouse in question. Scientists also need to identify the molecular pathways involved and replicate the results in other labs. But the findings are understood enough to have inspired the scientists to begin searching for cancer-resistant humans. "From early studies with healthy individuals, some humans are much more resistant than we thought," Cui says. "Human resistance is much, much stronger than [that of] mice." --David Biello

Dammed Impacts

May 18, 2006

10:29:47 am, Categories: Earth Science, Environment, Global Warming and Climate Change, Politics and Science, Public Policy, 624 words

By the end of this week, the Chinese government expects to pour the last concrete for the enormous Three Gorges Dam on the Yangtze River. Partially operational since 2003, the dam will be fully operational in 2009, according to the confident officials, bringing to a close more than a decade's worth of construction.

The nearly 8,000 foot long dam towers roughly 800 feet over the river below and will generate as much as 10 percent of China's current energy needs--more than 18,000 megawatts--in addition to improving navigation and reducing flooding, according to its champions. That's good news as far as China's ever-rising greenhouse gas emissions go since it derives the majority of its power from dirty coal-fired plants (although this is somewhat counterbalanced by the methane-emissions of microbes breaking down organic material in the reservoir behind the spillway). Of course, that percentage is set to decline precipitously as Chinese electricity demand rises, note its critics. And that is just the first of many charges.

In addition to flooding more than 1,000 archaeological sites with its sinuous 370-mile reservoir, Three Gorges has already begun to have an impact downstream. Since 1998 Taiwanese scientists have been measuring nutrient flows and plankton blooms in the East China Sea into which the river empties--home to a vital and vibrant fishing ground. The Yangtze used to discharge enough water to dilute the sea in the summer, but by August 2003--two months after the first filling phase of the reservoir--that fresh water influx had disappeared.

[More:]

And it has not reappeared in subsequent years, according to research published in the April 15 issue of Geophysical Research Letters. In fact, the size of the pool of diluted seawater has shrunk to just the mouth of the river. "In July 2004, when water discharge would have reached its maximum, the area of the [pool] still had not regained its former size prior to the filling of the reservoir," the researchers write.

The dam has also choked off the supply of sediment to the ocean and thus the supply of critical nutrients. This has given scientists an unprecedented chance to study the impacts of a dam on its downstream marine ecosystem. "Dinoflagellates that normally occurred in the coastal zone had almost disappeared within a few months of the filling of the reservoir," the scientists write. "Meanwhile, flagellates, such as prymnesiophytes, cryptophytes and chrysophytes had become the dominant species." After all, the Colorado River--dammed and drained repeatedly by the U.S.--no longer flows all the way to its mouth in Mexico, leaving ecosystem estimates to historians rather than marine biologists.

This ecosystem transformation may or may not be responsible for a host of strange phenomena in the East China Sea, including an invasion of giant jellyfish that is disrupting the coastal fisheries of Japan. But it is clear that the dam will have wide-ranging impacts For one thing, a host of subsidiary dams will need to be built, some in even more ecologically sensitive regions than Three Gorges, to prevent the giant dam from silting up in short order.

Silt may be just one of the dam's environmental foes, however. Researchers at the Chinese Academy of Sciences recently revealed that the Tibetan glaciers that feed Asia's rivers--the Yellow, Mekong, Ganges and Indus rivers, in addition to the Yangtze--are shrinking by 7 percent every year. The 60,000 square miles of glaciers on the so-called "roof of the world" are halving every decade--with subsequent effects on the rivers they feed--thanks to a two degree Fahrenheit rise in average temperatures in the region. The scientists called it an "ecological catastrophe" in the making and the loss of one enormous dam and a rich fishery may be the least of it. More than 300 million Chinese rely on glacier melt for survival. No dam can hold back that flood of discontent.


Posted by David Biello

New Antibiotic Eliminates Superbugs

May 18, 2006

Science Image: enterococcus
Image: CDC
A compound produced by a simple soil microbe may prove a new and extremely effective antibiotic. In recent decades, strains of Staphylococcus aureus and various Enterococcus bacteria have shown resistance to the most powerful antibiotics in the modern medical arsenal. The new compound has wiped out the two superbugs in vitro and in mice.

Jun Wang of Merck Research Laboratories and his colleagues tested 250,000 compounds extracted from microorganisms for antibiotic properties. Platensimycin, isolated from a strain of Streptomyces platensis found in a soil sample from South Africa, showed both strength and discretion in biochemical assays, targeting and defeating pathogens while seeming to show little danger of unwanted interactions. So the researchers tested it against superbugs in vitro. The compound bested methicillin-resistant S. aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci as well as other antibiotic-resistant microbes. It also showed no toxicity when put in contact with mammalian cells. Wang and his colleagues then tested the compound in mice infected with S. aureus. After 24 hours of treatment, the compound reduced the bacterial outbreak at least 10,000-fold and showed no deleterious effects on the mice themselves.


Their subsequent research shows that platensimycin works by inhibiting a pathogen's ability to synthesize fatty acids--the essential components of cell membranes. The new antibiotic inserts itself into the nascent chain of a fatty acid and blocks further lengthening, destroying the bacterium's ability to thrive.

"The path ahead remains a long one that includes further preclinical study, and, if these studies are successful, extensive clinical trials for safety and efficacy in humans," writes Eric Brown of McMaster University in Ontario in a commentary accompanying the piece in today's Nature. If it passes all of those tests, platensimycin could be the third new antibiotic--and the strongest--to reach patients in the last 40 years. --David Biello